|
"High-tech
videoconferencing hasn't quite caught on with lawyers"
By MARK MORRIS
December 26, 2002 ~ The Kansas City Star
Copyright Protocol Respected:
Published by Permission from The Kansas City Star - January
7, 2003
With three federal courtrooms in Kansas City brimming
with the latest high-tech audio-visual equipment, you would think
trials and hearings at the Charles Evans Whittaker Courthouse would
have evolved into multimedia marvels.
Not just yet.
U.S. District Judge Ortrie Smith, proprietor of one electronic
courtroom, said he still is waiting for a tech-savvy lawyer to take
advantage of his slick videoconferencing system.
"If I have a frustration, it is a reluctance to embrace new
technology on behalf of the bar," Smith said recently. "A
live teleconference will save a party thousands of dollars in travel
costs for expert witnesses. Either they (lawyers) are unaware or
they're unwilling to use it."
To interest more lawyers in the new gizmos, the court clerk's
office recently published a brochure detailing the electronic upgrades
and inviting attorneys to come in for training.
The improvements include videoconferencing, improved audio-conferencing,
computer display inputs for lawyers at the counsel tables and big-screen
monitors for the jury. Even the Elmo document display system --
a standard in U.S. courtrooms since the O.J. Simpson trial -- has
been improved with touch-screen capability. That allows witnesses
and lawyers to highlight portions of documents or photographs.
In addition to Smith's courtroom, those of Bankruptcy Judge Frank
W. Koger and District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan also have the new
gadgets.
Geoffrey Green, the clerk's courtroom technology specialist, is
the keeper of this wizardry. He, too, is eager to see more lawyers
get up to speed.
"It's going to change the way we do things," Green said.
Green pointed to a recent bankruptcy hearing, where lawyers in
Delaware participated by videoconference, while parties elsewhere,
including Massachusetts, joined by audio.
And though videoconferencing still is not routine in Kansas City,
courthouses in outlying areas, such as Jefferson City, use it regularly.
Green also noted that more jails and prisons are being equipped
with such gear.
"It saves manpower and addresses concerns about security
and safety by having them appear this way," he said.
Managing paper is one area where technology also can help, Green
said. In paper-intensive civil cases or complicated white-collar
fraud prosecutions, lawyers now can display documents electronically
from their laptops, rather than hauling in boxes. And the lawyers
now can search a mountain of electronic images in nanoseconds and
then bring one up on screens for jurors to view.
The federal judiciary has been famously resistant to technological
change, including the news cameras that are ubiquitous in state
courts. But judges and court staff in the Western District of Missouri
have an adventurous streak in them.
Federal court in Kansas City led the nation in adopting new computer
technology that allows lawyers to file civil, bankruptcy and, most
recently, criminal paperwork online.
Earlier this year, the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts
gave its highest employee award to clerk Pat Brune in Kansas City,
noting that she and her staff now serve as the main information
source for federal courts on electronic case filing.
"The judges of this district have been open to trying a lot
of new things," Smith said. "That places us in the vanguard
of districts across the country."
Now, if he can just get the lawyers to follow suit.
"We're all slow to embrace change. I don't fault this,"
Smith said. "I just wish they were quicker to come in and see
how things work."
To contact Mark Morris, federal courts reporter, call
(816) 234-4310 or send e-mail to mmorris@kcstar.com.
|